farrago.arinsattic.com
"so you've wrung your eyes of all their tears and caught them in a glass, to save them for some day next year, when you're waxing over your past, and should you ever begin to believe that the good part was worth all the waste, find your glass of last year's tears and you take a taste... - slobberbone, slippage"
May 06, 2008 @ 08:02 am

ahh.  finally someone articulates what it is that i’m feeling.  and they do so much better than i’m able to.  i am frustrated with politics, but unlike someone recently suggested to me—“yes, it’s frustrating when you just can’t get the idiots to like your candidate”—there is much, much more to it.  it isn’t a matter of these two candidates: obama and clinton.  the larger picture is still askew and it saddens me. 

The sorrow of which I speak flows not from the fact that liberation has not yet been achieved but from a fear that the possibility of liberation may be lost forever, that our world may have passed the point of no return, psychologically and ecologically. Such fears are not grounds for abandoning politics, however. If you believe there is something to what I’ve said, it suggests only that we should think more carefully about where we put our political energies. I believe that the last place we should be sinking our energy is into presidential politics. When the political leaders vying for our votes make it clear they are committed to systems and institutions that keep us locked in the death trajectory, why should we offer them anything that is precious to us?

The most common response I get to that challenge is the claim that these candidates actually have a more radical agenda but realize that they must keep it under wraps in order to get elected. Just wait, I’m told, until after an election victory. That is likely to be a long wait, for there is no historical precedent for such a development, and nothing in the biography of either candidate that suggests a break with history. This observation typically is dismissed as cynicism, but I am not cynical. I am simply trying to deal with reality.

If only a center/right candidate who p lays to the greed and delusional self-indulgence of the United States can win, that is more evidence that this empire cannot be transformed into a decent society in the time available and that it is time to say of conventional politics, simply, “game over.” If that is the case—and I believe it’s a reasonable account of our society—more than ever the work is not to turn over our time, energy, and resources to any political candidate but to build alternatives on the ground. That is a political response to a political problem. It isn’t a question of hope v. no hope. It’s a question of reality v. delusion. To believe that an unsustainable system can be sustained indefinitely—and to support political candidates who believe that—is a sign not of hope but of desperation and defeat. To be realistic and hopeful, one must be radical.

read the entire article: The sorrows of race and gender in the 2008 presidential election by Robert Jensen.


(0) Comments and (0) Trackbacks  •   Permalink  •   Tell-a-Friend

May 05, 2008 @ 08:53 pm
filed in:   government, elections2008, obama,

this article pretty well sums up my feelings on obama’s recent denouncing of rev wright.  i still feel that obama missed his chance, in teh very beginning, to turn this rev wright thing around.  to take in what was being said about rev wright, turn around, and refocus it as a positive.  after all, rev wright’s messages, while considered “off the wall” to many, are at their heart a call to end oppression.  to help those who have been oppressed, because ~all men were created equal~.  obama chose, instead, to first say he’d never heard the controversial statements by rev wright (which is unbelieved by many), then to cast rev wright as the “crazy uncle”, and now finally to divest himself of wright completely.  i don’t like it.  it was a choice between leading people and pandering to people.  he chose to pander.


Obama and Wright: Different Worldviews

“We did not have to go through any of the violent upheavals that Europe was forced to endure as it shed its feudal past. Our passage from an agricultural to an industrial society was eased by the sheer size of the continent, vast tracts of land and abundant resources that allowed new immigrants to continually remake themselves.” Barack Obama, The Audacity of Hope, p. 55

Jeremiah Wright summarized the difference between him and Obama in his interviews last weekend as, “I do what pastors do. He does what politicians do. I am not running for office.”

But there is more to it than this.

read on...


(0) Comments and (0) Trackbacks  •   Permalink  •   Tell-a-Friend

Page 1 of 1 pages